Comments on: Vize GUI Enhancer for Windows Vista Replaces Non-Vista Icons http://www.winhelponline.com/blog/vize-gui-enhancer-replaces-non-vista-icons/ Troubleshooting Windows 7/XP/Vista, Fixes & Tweaks | General Productivity Tips Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:33:46 +0000 hourly 1 By: 123 http://www.winhelponline.com/blog/vize-gui-enhancer-replaces-non-vista-icons/comment-page-1/#comment-9443 123 Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:18:28 +0000 http://www.winhelponline.com/blog/?p=923#comment-9443 but gotta wonder why anyone would want to replace xp's clear distinct icons with vista's muddy indistinct icons. wanting the reverse would be rational... but gotta wonder why anyone would want to replace xp’s clear distinct icons with vista’s muddy indistinct icons. wanting the reverse would be rational…

]]> By: John Dangerbrooks http://www.winhelponline.com/blog/vize-gui-enhancer-replaces-non-vista-icons/comment-page-1/#comment-8768 John Dangerbrooks Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:30:20 +0000 http://www.winhelponline.com/blog/?p=923#comment-8768 Thanks for the post, Ramesh. It was in the least informative, if not more than that. However, does Vize replaces resources in Microsoft Windows binaries? (Binaries = .EXE files, .DLL files, etc.) To me, this looks questionable as doing so (1) causes the digital signature of the affected binary files to become invalid and (2) is against the Microsoft End-User License Agreement for Windows Vista. This is too expensive a cost for just a simple cosmetic change. Thanks for the post, Ramesh. It was in the least informative, if not more than that.

However, does Vize replaces resources in Microsoft Windows binaries? (Binaries = .EXE files, .DLL files, etc.) To me, this looks questionable as doing so (1) causes the digital signature of the affected binary files to become invalid and (2) is against the Microsoft End-User License Agreement for Windows Vista. This is too expensive a cost for just a simple cosmetic change.

]]>